this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
-32 points (16.7% liked)

Conservative

389 readers
78 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge 22 points 9 months ago

And failure to treat their daughter's suicidal tendencies and depression. The fact that they did not approve of their daughter's gender was merely evidence that she couldn't trust them to ask them for help, and caused a rift in their relationship with her.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

You'd think after your child is taken away from you, you might finally look inward and realize you're shitty people, maybe try to change. But not these folks! Really explains the whole situation.

[–] dfc09 2 points 8 months ago

The state wasn't "keeping their child from them", the state was protecting a child who didn't want to go back to shitty parents.