this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Self Hosted - Self-hosting your services.

11401 readers
1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules

Important

Beginning of January 1st 2024 this rule WILL be enforced. Posts that are not tagged will be warned and if not fixed within 24h then removed!

Cross-posting

If you see a rule-breaker please DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So, I’ve been self-hosting for decades, but on physical hardware. I’ve had things like MythTV and an asterisk voip system, but those have been abandoned for years. I’ve got a web server, but it’s serving static content that’s only viewed by bots and attackers.

My mail server, that’s been active for more than two decades is still in active use.

All of this makes me weird in the self-hosted community.

About a month ago, I put in a beefy system for virtualization with the intent to start branching out the self hosting. I primarily considered Proxmox and xcp-ng. I went with xcp-ng, primarily because it seems to have more enterprise features. I’m early enough in my exploration that switching isn’t a problem.

For those of you more advanced in a home-lab hypervisor, what did you go with and why? Right now, I’m pretty agnostic. I’m comfortable with xcp-ng but have no problems switching. I’m particularly interested in opinions that have a particularly negative view of one or the other, so long as you explain why.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've personally used Proxmox in the past because it's easy to use, and it served pretty well for what I wanted to do (simple services like Headscale, Bitwarden, etc).

But I'm kind of a noob so you should probably ask more people.

It looks like [email protected] is more active and has become the "replacement" for r/selfhosted.

If you post there you'll probably get more helpful answers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If you don't actually want to allow external untrusted people accessing your server, why go the VM route? That seems like a huge waste of resources and just complicates things compared to using containers (Podman is best IMHO).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Please do add a tag to your post as stated on the sublemmy sidebar! Thank you. :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I like Promox for home, and XCP-NG for work. I'm just significantly more resource constrained at the house then work, so container management in the main interface is nice. At work, everything is a VM with containers on top (when needed)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ive tried all the main "Homelab Hypervisors" in my lab. VMWare, HyperV, Proxmox, XCP-NG/XenServer. I always come back to proxmox because it offers all of the features I need (HA and Backups primarily) in an extremely easy to use fashion.

I had a great deal of problems getting XCP-NG/XenOrchestra's backup process to function correctly.

Proxmox Backup Server just works. Its the first time in many years of homelabbing/SysAdmin in general where a solution does what its supposed to without needing to contact support.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I started with Proxmox in my homelab as I was a beginner and the proxmox forums were amazing as a resource to learn about everything proxmox. I decided to stick with it as it was so easy for a beginner like me.

load more comments
view more: next ›