A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
We've driven this relationship and we could have anticipated it too.
We drove it by ripping up a working non-proliferation agreement. Thanks Trump.
Autocrats seek autocrats. We didn’t do anything to make dictators and murderers want to be in familiar company
We did anticipate it. That's why Iran and Russia are pariah states. At least they have each other.
We have anticipated it. That's why our weapon systems are so good vs. Russian tactics.
Doesn't sound like news. But why to annouce it? Maybe that's the way to make these deals have more weight?
Nuclear technologies on the table?
Maybe that. In exchange for advancing drones for example. It's just the only country Russia ever shared them to is Belarus, the country they imported police forces in the wake of riots. It's that close relationship. I don't know if Iran has that privilege or Russia feels so desperate to share nukes and nuke accesories to a country it doesn't control like that. Either way, Iran getting nukes is as bad as it can be.
It would be bad for sure.
Had a nice treaty we were working on that could have help control that advancement. Thanks Donald, you fat, no-nothing fuck
LOL, all "Russian military innovation" in the past 30 years either been via theft or were just outright lies about their capability.
Russia =/= USSR
I know there are myriad problems with this idea, and the U.S. have failed miserably at this pretty much every time we tried it in the past, but; is there no feasible way we could covertly support a revolution to overthrow the Iranian government? The people certainly want it. Could we not help them?
We did enough to meddle into their affairs in the past and the end result is what you see now. There is no business for the US to be there. Although... this development changes a lot. Honestly this is another Trump/Bolton/war hawk conservative fuck up. By canceling the nuclear deal the US has no other inroads to talk directly with higher up officials in Iran. Even if it didn't stop a missile program it would have built a bridge that would have given SOME access to the regime. Now we are only looking over the fence at them and our only voice is going to be our military. What a shit show of geopolitics we've been lead into thanks to Trump. This is what Christians want more of? I hope we send all their children to war because I'm not sending mine.
I think we tried this a few years ago in a soft way, but it didn't work. Iran executed a lot of people.
Now the Iran leaders are plenty old and we're waiting for them to die to see the new government.
Bush Jr made it all happen. What a guy!
Gonna have to map that out for me.