this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
569 points (95.8% liked)

Political Memes

5520 readers
1802 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Which one of them has a lethal food allergy? I want to celebrate my pizza/taco with them.

[–] desmosthenes 1 points 10 months ago

the middle one actually has some money.. just sayin

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

6 and 7. Those two are doing more damage to the GOP than any of the tankies on this site could ever hope to do

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

#3 because I love Mexican food and #1 because McCarthy loves to bottom. #8 is a close third.

[–] WoahWoah 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

3 and 7 (or 9 depending on preference). Food and a blowjob sounds like a decent night.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zenjal 1 points 10 months ago

Wait, is 3 an 8 our reward?

[–] WR5 0 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I know this is all fun and games and to be taken in jest, so I understand the stick in the mud reply. However, I think people deserve to live. Choosing to save objects over people shows we (the collective we, not specifically the ones replying) are no better than conservatives who prioritize objects and money over lives. I'd like to think I'd help whomever is nearest/most injured/in most need of help etc. in the situation, just like if it was any other arbitrary group of people. My standards shouldn't change just because they wouldn't do the same for me, my conscience would still feel guilty even if theirs wouldn't.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's the "golden rule". Do onto others as you would have them do to you. You're arguing against the bronze rule which is an eye for an eye, which is an excellent point.

Mathematical modeling has shown that the most just societies operate on the gold plated bronze rule. The idea here is that you initially treat people according to the golden rule, however after repeated abuse wears out the plating you transition to the bronze rule. This ensures human decency while protecting against agents acting in bad faith trying to profit by destroying society and repeatedly abusing the golden rule.

In this case you leave them in the fire, not because they would do it to you, but because they have burned and continue to burn so many people that every second they're alive they cause a tremendous damage to society.

[–] WR5 1 points 10 months ago

That makes sense. Keeping them alive would do more net damage than saving them, in terms of human lives.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 10 months ago

Sigh.

The youngest ones are still humans, even though I’d be happier with just saving the pizza.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 10 months ago

6 + 7 and hate fuck them both

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›