It seems like an odd choice to put bigger numbers lower down, when we generally associate them with up. Any idea why it's visualized that way?
Firefox
The latest news and developments on Firefox and Mozilla, a global non-profit that strives to promote openness, innovation and opportunity on the web.
You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:
Related
- Firefox Customs: [email protected]
- Thunderbird: [email protected]
Rules
While we are not an official Mozilla community, we have adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as far as it can be applied to a bin.
Rules
-
Always be civil and respectful
Don't be toxic, hostile, or a troll, especially towards Mozilla employees. This includes gratuitous use of profanity. -
Don't be a bigot
No form of bigotry will be tolerated. -
Don't post security compromising suggestions
If you do, include an obvious and clear warning. -
Don't post conspiracy theories
Especially ones about nefarious intentions or funding. If you're concerned: Ask. Please don’t fuel conspiracy thinking here. Don’t try to spread FUD, especially against reliable privacy-enhancing software. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Show credible sources. -
Don't accuse others of shilling
Send honest concerns to the moderators and/or admins, and we will investigate. -
Do not remove your help posts after they receive replies
Half the point of asking questions in a public sub is so that everyone can benefit from the answers—which is impossible if you go deleting everything behind yourself once you've gotten yours.
I think it is so that on all graphs "lower" down is better. But agree it's kind of unusual layout. Looking at the graphs for Linux i wonder what happened in feb 11:th this year - where all values for Firefox got a lot worse.
Sometimes the hardware or software configurations of the machines running the tests changes, or a bug in the test harness itself is fixed, which can skew all of the results at once.
Stupid question, but which of the benchmarks corelates closest to video/stream playback? Since that was still the area I felt the biggest difference when I compared last, especially opening multiple videos and streams (on twitch and yt). I just wonder if it was my imagination or if there is still a difference.
Which platform are you on?
windows 10 (sorry for the long delay)
No worries, that's odd, usually you should get great video acceleration performance in Firefox Windows, so not sure what's happening here. Perhaps make sure your video drivers are up to date?
Im usually on the latest update. I have to actually probably do some benchmarks to see if there really is a difference. Can't trust my feeling