Conservative

389 readers

60 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

-42

The future of Bidenomics: You pay Social Security tax on all of your income? (www.foxbusiness.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

81 comments fedilink hide all child comments

That’s a hard pass for me. I’d rather opt out of social security. It’s a ponzi scam. If the government had put that into a private account, I’d have millions of dollars in there.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] glimse 13 points 10 months ago (23 children)

If the government had put that into a private account, I’d have millions of dollars in there.

I assumed you started working in 1977 for $120k/year (that's $630k in today's value btw) and retired today, contributing 6.2% monthly from the start and put it in a 6% monthly compounding savings account, you'd be just shy of millions ($1.9m).

I did not account for raises because if you've made over $7m in your lifetime, you don't need the cash payout from social security anyway. It's a safety net for people who can't afford to save for retirement - and they've been paying into it their whole lives, too.

I'm not a fan of how social security has been handled (or that I'm not going to benefit as much as boomers have) but social security for everyone benefits the country.

load more comments (23 replies)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (46 children)

Gotta jack that corporate tax rate way up Morty. Get it way up there. Financial services, insurance and landlords are like 20% of the GDP alone. Tax the ever living fuck out of those leaches.

load more comments (46 replies)

[–] jordanlund 7 points 10 months ago (10 children)

Currently, everyone earning less than $168,600 ALREADY pays social security tax on all their income.

So... what? 90% of wage earners?

load more comments (10 replies)

[–] skydivekingair 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The difference between Social Security and a Ponzi Scheme is the Ponzi lures people in with promises of high rate of return. Social Security is involuntary and promises flat returns (not even rate since deduction amounts are different based on earnings).

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments