this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
99 points (98.1% liked)

Ukraine

7971 readers
1186 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
99
Losses of the Russian military to 4.7.2023 (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by boonana to c/[email protected]
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 04.07.23 were approximately:

  • personnel - about 231030 (+770) people were liquidated,
  • tanks - 4059 (+2) units
  • APVs - 7908 (+9) units
  • artillery systems - 4252 (+32) units,
  • MLRS - 647 (+6) units,
  • air defense systems / Anti-aircraft warfare systems - 394 (+3) units
  • aircraft - 315 (+0) units
  • helicopters - 309 (+0) units,
  • UAV operational-tactical level - 3602 (+29),
  • cruise missiles - 1264 (+0),
  • ships / boats / warships / boats - 18 (+0) units,
  • vehicles and fuel tanks - 6843 (+9) units,
  • special equipment - 590 (+0).
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EvilCartyen 9 points 1 year ago

Still lots of artillery being hit, seems they're still clearing the way for the main phase of the counteroffensive. I wonder if we'll see a breakthrough at any point, like in Kharkiv, or if that was a lucky punch.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That is brutal. 231 thousand Russian humans being killed for a dumb war just to try and grab some land.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am very certain that number includes also injured and missing soldiers. Still mind boggling.

[–] Jives 2 points 1 year ago

It absolutely does include wounded. Ukraine keeps their wording vague, perhaps on purpose, but there’s no way their estimate of KIA is 4-5x higher than any credible western estimate.

It’s still an absurd number of casualties, and it’s absurd that Russian citizens don’t seem to care at all.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

More like trying to stay in power (and alive) no matter what. Totally useless war, but then again, most of them are...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As if Russia even needs more land.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As I understand their war aims, they need this particular land because without it they lose access to the Black Sea, which severely curtails their access to the Atlantic. Their other ports are in the North Atlantic and tend to be frozen over and unusable during the winter. If they lose Sevastopol, they're greatly reduced as an Atlantic power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They could realistically have kept Sevastopol and the rest of Crimea if they just hadn't invaded the rest of Ukraine; now it's all at stake.

But even so, if they lose Sevastopol, there are other Russian ports along the Black Sea, notably Novorossiysk. While that's much less strategically located, and costly upgrades would be required to function as a marine base, it's not strictly true that they would lose access to the Black Sea altogether.

Apologies in advance if this is hopelessly armchair, happy to have my amateur observations nuanced.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Tank losses have slowed to a bare trickle. I guess Ivan is out of armor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

How to even imagine this 770 people per day!