this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
35 points (97.3% liked)

Politics

1025 readers
1 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 2 years ago
 

The letter did not include any specific demands nor did it outline how the attorneys general believe the campaign could violate child protection laws.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PeterGintz 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"However, Target management does have fiduciary duties to its shareholders to prudently manage the company and act loyally in the company's best interests."

Not sure how reaching out to more groups to sell more products and generate more profit amongst those groups previously left out of the equation is not in the company’s best interest.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

republican ags: thats a nice store shame if something happened to it.

[–] billiam0202 3 points 1 year ago

They're implying there are more hateful bigots in the US and that Target would lose more money by them not shopping there due to Pride merch than they'd make by selling it.

Which is probably not true for Target's clientele, but my local Walmart definitely didn't have any rainbow stuff for sale this year.