this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
179 points (96.4% liked)

World News

38532 readers
3205 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

why would you expect it from an anticar lobby sub? Like, it’s a political movement… not a scientific research facility?

You and I are in full agreement on this. I have zero issue with this content in the anti car lobby sub, except that's not where the poster is putting it anymore. They're posting it in "worldnews". This is why I have a problem with it here, but not there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I mean we're here in the comments to exchange perspectives primarily. Never saw anyone quoting research papers. There's no rule about forbidding comments to be biased or opinionated. So I'd say our access to any form of potential objective truth, as fundamental basis for discussion, is fairly limited. World news is not only about scientifically validated facts. It's rather a fast paced informational feed, where you have to balance speed and factual quality.

And we had context for the anticar lobby comment, so it's not like the person said: look, here is the irrefutable truth from an independent source. They rather said: Look here are some reasons for why XYZ is bad.

I don't have a problem with it, besides it being a lazy and hard to read solution.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So instead of thinking about anything that is written there and looking it up, it is all backed by scientific research, you just attack the messenger. Great work of anti intellectualism.

[–] partial_accumen 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

So instead of thinking about anything that is written there and looking it up, it is all backed by scientific research,

“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” - Christopher Hitchens

you just attack the messenger.

Read every single one of my posts here in this thread. There are zero attacks on the messenger.