this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
185 points (88.1% liked)

Comic Strips

12953 readers
4788 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Garfield Minus Garfield was interesting because of the silly situations that came from the otherwise unmodified comics.

Maybe it's just me, but changing the dialog so that it makes sense without Heathcliff being there feels like it kind of takes away from the whole gimmick.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I would say more than being funnier the one way or the other, the point is to show that Heathcliff is not necessary for his own comic.

The comic shows a silly situation that does not change much with his presence. The cat is just there so people know this is a Heathcliff comic.

To my understanding, what people enjoy in these comics are the reoccurring characters, objects, and plot lines

[–] ThrowawaySobriquet 4 points 7 months ago

Heathcliff, Heathcliff
No one should
Exist solely to brand their goods

[–] BluesF 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I've been seeing these for ages and I have never understood what's funny about either the version with or without Heathcliff. It's quite bizarre to find something so far removed from my sense of humour that I don't get it even once.

[–] FauxPseudo 12 points 7 months ago (3 children)
[–] BluesF 7 points 7 months ago

I'd anything this just provided me with a well worded explanation for why I don't like it:

It’s zany but not fun, there’s no joke, just “Here’s a thing, and here’s another thing, these two things don’t normally go together, but here they are together, isn’t that funny?”

[–] Darkard 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

His upbringing?

His parents are in jail! I assume his mom is there on prostitution charges

This was funnier than any heathcliff comic I've seen so far

[–] FauxPseudo 1 points 7 months ago

The fact that we have no idea why Iggy lives with his grandparents has caused a lot of speculation. And it's not even a NAPG thing. It goes back to the beginning in the 70s. Back when a kid living with their grandparents usually meant prison or death took the parents out of the picture.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeeeeaah. His instructions are: indoctrinate yourself with standard brainwashing techniques. Read it, even though you don't like it, and keep reading it, until you do.

Well-written essay, though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

It's nothing really. Heathcliff is a trash comic. The "jokes" are barely jokes. Maybe 1 in 20 get so much as an exhale out of me, let alone actual laughter.

[–] FauxPseudo 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In order to remove Heathcliff I occasionally need to change the text that refers to him to completely remove him. Otherwise there is a ghost of Heathcliff and that won't do.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

If the text hadn't changed, I would have assumed it was the shop keeper yelling it at Yoda. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] FauxPseudo 1 points 7 months ago

Then there is the issue that Yoda has a specific way of talking. It would be weird if the shopkeeper used it too.

[–] FauxPseudo 1 points 7 months ago

Understandable. Except that in the Heathcliff comics. If there is any kind of speech from a character, im this case the butcher swearing, the bottom text is never from the same person.

No one ever speaks twice.