this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
8 points (100.0% liked)

Shell Scripting

120 readers
1 users here now

From Ash, Bash and Csh to Xonsh, Ysh and Zsh; all shell languages are welcome here!

Rules:
  1. Follow Lemmy rules!
  2. Posts must relate to shell scripting. (See bottom of sidebar for more information.)
  3. Only make helpful replies to questions. This is not the place for low effort joke answers.
  4. No discussion about piracy or hacking.
  5. If you find a solution to your problem by other means, please take your time to write down the steps you used to solve your problem in the original post. You can potentially help others having the same problem!
  6. These rules will change as the community grows.

Keep posts about shell scripting! Here are some guidelines to help:


In general, if your submission text is primarily shell code, then it is welcome here!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

i'm pretty new to the shell scripting world and not sure, if i should give my scripts a .sh or .bash extension.

not sure what the pros and cons are.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Usually I have most of my (admittedly very few) scripts be .sh with #!/bin/bash. I do have a few that don't have an extension however, and those are in my $PATH intended to be used as shell commands

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This is how I do it as well. Shell scripts that I include in a project are named with a .sh extension so other users can identify them easily. Scripts that I want to run as commands often are in my $HOME/bin/ and don’t have an extension. Sometimes those are convenience symlinks with easier names, so ~/bin/example might be a link to ~/repos/example-project/example-script-with-long-name.sh.