this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
27 points (86.5% liked)

PC Gaming

8581 readers
298 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

I must be in the minority, but I’ve been digging Intels Arc GPUs. For their price point and the fact I don’t play bleeding edge AAA games, they’ve actually done pretty well. Additionally I’m tired of nvidia’s price gouging and AMD following after, I want to support a disruptive third party. Their driver support gets better every release and I can’t wait to see their next generation of cards.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I agree with the Arc cards.

They are good, they are cheap, and they're targeting the midrange to low-end hardware segment which is not covered by any other manufacturer.

I have a 3090 in my desktop but I have an Arc card on my server for Moonlight/Sunshine streaming, as well as Plex transcoding. It's the cheapest card to have AV1 encoding built in.

I also keep seeing them increase performance significantly with every driver update, which is pretty cool.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm interested in your use of the Arc card for media transcoding. What one did you get and how would you say it compares to a GTX 960? The one in my server died and I stuck a spare 2060 in there a while back and am looking to downgrade to something sensible.

Most of my media is 1080p x264 with some 4k HEVC (and growing) if that helps.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I had a 1050ti in the machine and I bought an A770. It's overpowered for transcoding but I do remotely stream games at 1080p, which is a good workout for the card.

For simple transcoding I would buy the A310 since it's the cheapest card with AV1. I'm running an old 6th Gen i7-6600k and I had to mess with the UEFI to allow REBAR, but I used this tool to do it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Too many edge case issues, especially for someone who plays a lot of indie titles and uses Linux. Also, they kinda just went into the low performance market. If they'd launch something for the upper midrange I'd be more interested (assuming they improved on a lot of fronts of course).

[–] VaultBoyNewVegas 2 points 6 months ago

I'd get an arc when upgrading but I've an 6800xt so there wouldn't be an upgrade for me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Didn't even know Intel made dedicated GPUs. The integrated ones have always been positively terrible.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

The new dedicated cards are actually very good. They sell them at a competitive price because they are not powerhouses, but they get the job done. If you're targeting 1080p at your top end, it's almost a no-brainer to go with an Arc card. If you're pushing a higher resolution, it's probably better to go with another manufacturer, unless you're fine with higher resolutions and lower framerates.