this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
50 points (77.2% liked)

Games

17403 readers
1410 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

the FPS genre didn’t exist

Wolfenstein…

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

People arguing with the video without having watched it lmao

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I have watched the video. I think it's Stuart's worst.

The thesis statement is more like "We now call Doom an FPS, but that term really didn't come about until Half Life, so what did they call Doom at the time?" Which would have been a quick aside in another video, but here it's the whole thing. I don't think there's enough meat there for a whole video, and the "obviously, but what I'm really getting at is..." title isn't great.

Given a choice, I'm going to rewatch Chicken-o-meter instead of this video.

[–] gaylord_fartmaster 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He's not saying Doom was the first FPS, he's saying the term "First Person Shooter" didn't exist yet to describe the few games it would apply to at the time.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

Then the title should've said that... But it's asking what the current genre is in the title (uses word "is"), presumably to appeal to the "Boomer shooter" vs "FPS" debate, when that's not what the video is about at all.

A better title would be: "What genre was Doom? Hint: FPS didn't exist yet." Or even just "What genre was Doom originally?" Neither is click-baity or overly long.

[–] Kelly 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The video covers that and Catacomb 3-D, which I don't remember hearing about before but it looks like they released it half a year earlier.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

...ye gads, something about the low-framerate EGA + flat topology in catacombs 3D gave me ferocious motion sickness at the time; even looking at screenshots still makes me feel queasy to this day...

(never had that problem with ultima underworld)