this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
828 points (97.7% liked)

Open Source

31218 readers
278 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 127 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Ignore them. Send a pull request with the full source of Arch Linux.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Nah, just a giant compiled binary blob. That's what all the cool hackers do these days.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

I’ll try a supply chain attack! That’s a good trick!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

dumb question maybe, but where is the full source of arch Linux? My understanding is that its just vanilla Linux that uses the pacman package manager.

Am I wrong in saying the pacman is the Arch source? Or is there more going on in the tar ball?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Cheers! It looks like this is then the PKGBUILD

https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/base/-/blob/main/PKGBUILD?ref_type=heads

In which case, there are no packages defined there which are Arch specific except pacman. So... pacman is the Arch source, right?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

A lot of these packages have Arch-specific modifications. For example, filesystem doesn't even have a non-Arch upstream as it defines the filesystem layout. That PKGBUILD and everything it depends on is the Arch source. Distributions are defined by which packages they include.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

ah, thanks for the clarification!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

There is even a sentence in README.md that makes it explicit:

The source files in this repo are for historical reference and will be kept static, so please don’t send Pull Requests suggesting any modifications to the source files […]

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Somebody fork it then?

[–] laughterlaughter 5 points 6 months ago