this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
888 points (99.2% liked)

World News

39173 readers
3716 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A German politician has been filmed taking large sums of cash from a Kremlin-supporting broadcaster, Czech intelligence has claimed.

Petr Bystron, who is standing for Alternative for Germany (AfD) at European parliamentary elections in June, allegedly received €20,000 (£17,000) in cash from the manager of a Russian propaganda network while sitting in a parked car, recordings indicate.

Mr Bystron, who also sits on the Bundestag’s foreign affairs committee, has previously denied allegations of taking Russian money as a “defamation campaign”.

The Security Information Service (BIS), the Czech Republic’s domestic intelligence agency, now says Mr Bystron met with Artem Marchevsky, who allegedly managed a Kremlin-backed propaganda front called Voice of Europe, at least three times in the past six months.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They are relying entirely on numbers provided by Hamas. There is no independent third party counting casualties in the strip.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Conflating the Gaza Ministry of Health with Hamas is a very common propaganda tactic. The truth is that they operate under the de-facto government of Gaza, which is Hamas, but they don't work for them as in pushing their agenda. Your statement of the numbers being "provided by Hamas" is entirely false tho.

The numbers they provided in the past passed verification by third party investigations (Examples: 2014 war comparison with B'Tselem and analysis of the current war's numbers by The Lancet) and are considered to be reliable. During an active war, independent verification is pretty much impossible tho.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Okay, so where should casualty figures come from?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's fine to admit that we simply don't know until the war is over. Only then can a true count be possible, without terrorists interfering.

[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And who will make the count then?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ideally an independent party, like an NGO with no affiliations to Hamas and Israel.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And how would they make such a count? Dig all the bodies out of the rubble and find where all the unmarked mass graves are?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Head count of the survivors vs. pre-war records.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The pre-war records kept by Hamas? Who you said can't be trusted?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Think about this for a second. Hamas has an interest in accurate internal head counts for e.g. tax purposes - they were the de-facto government of the strip, after all. Their public statements cannot be trusted.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So they wouldn't want to know what their head count is now? Or they're just lying about it now but weren't lying about it then? You're not really making much sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you are not just deliberately doing the old "just asking questions" thing and are legitimately having difficulties with understanding relatively simple concepts.

There is a difference between their internal numbers and their outside communication. It's quite easy to keep an accurate head count during peace time and they did that, for taxing purposes alone - and to maintain the level of control that they wanted as the rulers of an oppressive police state. Just in case you didn't know what kind of place Gaza was before the war.

However, they actually have no idea right now, because it's war, it's chaotic, with shifting front lines, people being displaced, caught under the rubble, disfigured bodies with no identifying marks, families getting torn apart and not knowing what happened to their loved ones, etc.

You know, the same chaos as in every other war. You can't keep accurate records under these conditions, especially considering that everything even remotely resembling an official Hamas government office has been bombed to smithereens or overrun by ground troops - but Hamas pretends that they do, with precise casualty figures published incredibly frequently. That's not how this works. Israel needed months for an accurate count of their deaths from just October 7th, despite the fact that the fighting within Israel lasted only for a day or two. Ukraine has huge "unknowns" about their population in occupied areas and where there has been or is fighting.

Yet Hamas of all people somehow are omniscient record keepers - and barely anyone is willing to question it. We then get a game of telephone of increasingly reputable parties repeating Hamas numbers to one another, until people can naively say that "the BBC" or "the UN" is reporting something, oblivious to the actual source of the information. It's as if nobody learned how to properly trace sources at school or university.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 7 months ago

Don't they have to communicate with the outside to give people those internal numbers? At which point, they will be a lie?