this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
610 points (97.5% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29026 readers
6 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to [email protected] e-mail.

Report contact

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So far Lemmy is vibing. Everyone here is excited and optimistic and willing to put up with a few rough spots to be part of something.

When the Eternal September comes, which it will, how does a Lemmy instance deal with bad actors?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] oryx 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think some bots are good. I could personally go without seeing the bots that reply to comments when something specific is said, but many subs had helpful bots in them.

[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am not into automatic memes. I do enjoy bots with specific callable functionality like looking up the Wiki, IMDB, whatever, or the reverse video bot.

I just don't want to see the "good bot" reply everytime a bot does something.

[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong but the whole 'good bot' thing was to help the bot to improve and moderators to remove bad bots? I'm easily wrong on this but that was my understanding. It helped with the pruning of bad bots and the growth of good ones.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Something I enjoyed is how, during the rise of /r/transcribersofreddit transcribing image content into a comment, because of their standardised formatting, people often assumed they were a bot, so would comment "Good bot".

However, they were human posters, and this was often revealed by another bot that would look out for "good bot"/"bad bot" votes on (seemingly) human posts and say "are you sure [user] is a bot? Because I'm 97.84% sure they're not".

Eventually, it was common to see people replying to the image transcribers' comments with "Good human." and that always made me smile.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Oh, I had no idea about the culture surrounding bots. I just thought it was a memetic response. Makes sense.

[โ€“] oryx 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly, that was so annoying. Or bots coming to correct grammar, or make haikus. They're fun at first and then they're just spam.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, this is what I mean when I say I want human only interaction. To extend to the future, I never want to have a conversation with ChatGPT or whatever crap comes along. AI can be useful but the way it is used for deception disgusts me to the core.