Vegan

311 readers

2 users here now

An online space for the vegans of Lemmy.

Rules and miscellaneous:

We take for granted that if you engage in this community, you understand that veganism is about the animals. You either are vegan for the animals, or you are not (this is not to say that discussions about climate/environment/health are not allowed, of course)
No omni/carnist apologists. This is not a place where to ask to be hand-holded into veganims. Omnis coddling/backpatting is not tolerated, nor are /r/DebateAVegan-like threads
Use content warnings and NSFW tags for triggering content
Circlejerking belongs to /c/vegancirclejerk
All posts should abide by Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

689

Double A. (lemmy.world)

submitted 7 months ago by BonesOfTheMoon to c/[email protected]

116 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Dasus 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You wouldn’t need to sterilize more deer for population control than with hunting, obviously.

So you're sterilising deer for literally nothing, as a sterilised deer still has to eat, deary.

https://wildscapedeermanagement.co.uk/pages/ecological-impact-of-deer-overpopulation

"How is that unfeasible"

Because the non-spayed deer will just procreate more. You're not doing population control at all with your approach, even if it was possible. I ask you, do you think you can take a fishing pole and fish a lake empty? No, ofc not, that is ridiculous. What your proposing is equally if not more ridiculous. You're thinking about nature as if it was a fenced area that you are in charge of. Very arrogant of you, tbh.

You're the type of person who gives veganism a bad name, imo. You're probably one of those people who think "Thanos was right", huh?