this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
60 points (96.9% liked)
Technology
60061 readers
2965 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What is worrying about Google being involved with this report? They have an internet security division, this is exactly their job?
My point being that they deem this serious enough to release publicly themselves instead of an internal memory, and that this is about an active threat actor rather than a mere vulnerability.
Google has been trying to get into the security game for a while, especially after Microsoft parachuting to the top with Defender/Sentinel etc.
It’s good business to release threat intelligence that speaks to high-profile topics to garner credibility.
With that said, they revealed nothing new that we, security professionals (inc. gov agencies), didn’t already know for a long while.
Cyber security companies report on APTs all the time, nothing unusual about that.