this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
56 points (81.1% liked)

science

13638 readers
696 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chestnut -4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Very interesting article

The issue feels a lot like climate change. Pollution that affects us on a global scale that will make some people immensely rich and it's up to the cooperation of countries to research, mitigate, and control it

[–] victorz 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)
[–] Chestnut 1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Updated

Not sure why I'm being down voted so much, lol.

Wish people would engage if they disagree instead of just doing a drive by

I'm friendly, I promise!

[–] infinitepcg 1 points 2 months ago

that will make some people immensely rich

Not sure what this means. Most satelites make everyone a little bit richer (weather, GPS, communication satelites).

it’s up to the cooperation of countries to research, mitigate, and control it

I would argue that companies SpaceX have a lot to lose from space debris. If space becomes inaccessible, they can't do any business. They do a lot to mitigate space debris (especially with Starlink), and this is rational because too much space debris threatens their mission.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)