this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
460 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

35718 readers
211 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SuperSynthia 156 points 10 months ago (32 children)

So Microsoft is one of the most valuable companies in the entire world. They have a stranglehold on corporate America, power a huge the cloud infrastructure, hold one of the largest sources of telemetry/user data, and are the defacto standard of PC environments worldwide.

Why in the fuck do they need to pivot to ads? I’m genuinely curious. Even if they lost 50% of their entire business they would still be one of the most profitable companies in the world.

[–] jasep 142 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Because when you have shareholders, there's no such thing as "we're profitable enough". Shareholders always demand more. Ads means more profit, at least in the short term. Next quarter profits are all that matter to public companies.

It's obscene, but it's the way it is.

[–] grue 9 points 10 months ago (4 children)

but it's the way it is.

It doesn't have to be, of course. Taking a look at the long, sordid history of how the privilege of incorporation has been perverted in this way, it becomes clear what needs to be done to fix it.

[–] jasep 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I read the article you referenced, but it's not clear to me. What needs to be done to fix it?

[–] grue 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Basically, abolish corporate personhood by overturning the sequence of court decisions cited in the article that got us to this point. Or, as the last sentence in the article hyperlinks to, pass these Constitutional Amendments.

[–] jasep 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Unless I'm missing something, what "needs to be done to fix it" and what is in the realm of possibility seem to be two very different things.

[–] grue 5 points 10 months ago

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I didn't say it was easy, just clear.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)