Technology

59777 readers

4723 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

937

Fairbuds are Fairphone’s proof that we really could make better tiny gadgets (arstechnica.com)

submitted 7 months ago by Diplomjodler3 to c/technology

206 comments fedilink hide all child comments

But of course we all know that the big manufacturers don't do this not because they can't but because they don't want to. Planned obsolescence is still very much the name of the game, despite all the bullshit they spout about sustainability.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

but I really don't understand the hate for devices that don't have one.

I like to have the choice. And I choose not having to buy another device.

in a world where Bluetooth reigns supreme.

We must think of different aspects then.

Reliability - battery charge, potential signal loss (note that I have no experience with wireless headphones, so the second point could be wrong.)
Longevity - batteries that degrade vs a cable that's fine if you don't abuse it
Ease of use - Plug it into what I want vs pairing process, possible problems with switching, devices sometimes malfunction (meaning software-wise)
(Audio quality - I can plug them into any DAC I want vs being limited to the built in one - I will not pretend to be able to hear the difference between 16bit/48kHz and something higher. But I still could use an audio interface that can do it.)