this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
25 points (100.0% liked)
Danger Dust
228 readers
3 users here now
A community for those occupationally exposed to dusts, toxins, pollutants, hazardous materials or noxious environments
Dangerous Dusts , Fibres, Toxins, Pollutants, Occupational Hazards, Stonemasonry, Construction News and Environmental Issues
#Occupational Diseases
#Autoimmune Diseases
#Silicosis
#Cancer
#COPD
#Chronic Fatigue
#Hazardous Materials
#Kidney Disease
#Pneumoconiosis
#The Environment
#Pollutants
#Pesticides
and more
Please be nice to each other and follow the rules : []https://mastodon.world/about
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
1 mask to use for 6 months doesn't seem like it's anywhere near enough. But my question is was the mask of sufficient quality to start with, or did it degrade into an insufficient state? Or were they given the mask but chose not to use it?
Given the conditions of being in an inclosed space with no air circulation, safety doesn't seem to be a top priority. Breathing in any type of fine particles in that amount consistently isn't going to be good long term.
Masks are only supposed to be used as the very last resort ,it matters not a jot if you have a top of the range respirator ,in those conditions workers could put a new filter in their masks every morning and they would still be breathing in dust . No fit is ever perfect and they all leak.
There simply should be no people working in such areas, full stop. Not even if they were kitted out with PAPR respirators and the unit had a regulator specified and fully certified LEV system running 24/7. These are areas where only machines should be employed . But once again it all comes down to production costs and profit..People are cheap. Take care ,stay safe and dust free.