this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
368 points (99.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9679 readers
573 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TaTTe 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Almost as if it's possible to improve even the largest cities' infrastructure to be more human friendly. Almost as if there's no reason bad urban design should remain bad forever. Huh, who knew...

[–] whereisk 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A lot cheaper than building nearly any other infrastructure.

I haven't run the numbers but I'd venture a guess that it's even cheaper than maintaining the car bearing roads.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm always blown away at how people will not think twice when billions are spent on adding an extra lane to a road, but lose their minds when a couple million are spent on a bike lane.

I'd love to see a return on investment analysis done on something like this.

[–] whereisk 10 points 7 months ago

That's because they think you're taking away their road (the concept of induced demand does not make for an easy headline), and are adding slower vehicles to the mix that will slow them down and they have to be twice as careful so they don't hit anyone.

And to be fair, the bare minimum spend, badly designed bike lanes do both: terrifying for bikers and annoying for motorists.

It's what happens when bike lanes are a side project amongst "serious city business"

But proper infrastructure does not mix the two types of traffic except rarely and frees road for those that don't have a choice but to use a car.