this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
270 points (80.7% liked)

Political Memes

6252 readers
3950 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Every previous president would have ended it by now."

"Biden literally couldn't do worse."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (35 children)

Unfortunately the American electoral system is not ranked choice, so "bar of acceptability" isn't a functionally meaningful concept. In American elections, the situation is as I've described above. Refusing to choose one of the two primary options functionally means you find both primary options equally acceptable.

[–] federatingIsTooHard -2 points 10 months ago (29 children)

duverger's "law" has no predictive value. it's a tautology as empty as "supply and demand".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

Tautologies are statements that are necessarily true by virtue of their construction. In order to show that something is tautological, you must reduce it to an open statement and be able to show that it's true independent of the variables. Tautologies include "Not Q or Q" and the equivalent "If Q then Q". Furthermore, stating that something is a tautology implies that you believe it's true. The last time I encountered someone claiming that something didn't have predictive value "because it's a tautology" was a creationist saying the same of evolution, and I realized they had essentially granted their opponent's conclusion.

[–] federatingIsTooHard -1 points 10 months ago

a tautology is also an appropriate term for any post hoc explanation of material facts that gives no insight into how the future will happen.

duverger's "law" is storytelling, it's not science.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)