World News

32159 readers

829 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

482

NATO Proposes $100 Billion, Five-Year Fund to Aid Ukraine (www.bloomberg.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

225 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm not saying there isn't reason for those countries to want to joint an alliance against their imperialist neighbor, but honestly it's kinda hard not to see how NATO's influence has been abused for purposes other than defense.

[–] SkyezOpen 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I won't even disagree, but that still is not a valid excuse to invade a soverign country.

[–] TokenBoomer 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Russia wanted to join NATO under Clinton. NATO said no because a nation has to be stable and not in a conflict to join. Russia had a conflict in Chechnya.

(_see where I’m going _)

Ukraine wanted to join NATO. But if Russia invaded, they can’t join.

[–] SkyezOpen 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I know why they did it. That doesn't make it valid.

[–] TokenBoomer 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Valid? War isn’t reasonable.

[–] SkyezOpen 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Justified, then. Much like Israel's ongoing bullshit in Gaza is not anywhere near justified.

[–] TokenBoomer 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Oh, you want me to make a moral judgement. Okay. NATO and Putin are to blame. NATO shouldn’t have expanded, and Putin should let his neighbors have sovereignty without meddling in their governments.