this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
48 points (83.3% liked)
Games
32736 readers
2981 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ah. The "I'll just tolerate this until it gets worse" mindset. Never backfires!
Surely even you can admit that slipping this in on release was a scummy move.
It's "theoretical" only because there is no non-monetised version. They could have created a cheat shop with the items for free. Even if you choose not to use them having that option means it is a better experience, so it would still be a "diminished experience".
If someone can pay extra money to get a different game experience from you then the publishers have denied you the chance at that experience which is "diminished".
This isn't even mentioning the performance issues on lunch that would be tolerated because "surely they'll fix it later!".
Sure you don't care. Many people don't care. And surely someone is going to try and highlight this apathy as a virtue somehow. And so publishers get to continue experimenting with how to milk franchises for every dollar it can instead of making an optimal game experience, overall making the game industry worse.