this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
83 points (98.8% liked)

RetroGaming

19668 readers
763 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Xylinna
Tenthrow
gts
83
at what point do you draw the line for "retro"? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/retrogaming
78 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

And what category does the PS2, Wii, Xbox, Nintendo DS/3DS fit into? They aren't retro, but they're not really "modern" either

Edit:sorry about posting 4 times, it kept telling me that it had a correction error

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

My line is at the transition from 2d to 3d mostly.

2d is retro. Early 3d is like the awkward teenage years. Everything since Xbox 360/PS3 is modern to me.

[–] adibis 4 points 1 year ago

Yup. Initial 3D games were, let's just say awkward.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

My line is at the transition from 2d to 3d mostly.

Strictly speaking, the two co-existed long before 3D became the vogue on consoles; Revs is a proper racing simulator in 1984.