this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
182 points (97.9% liked)

Futurology

1785 readers
95 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I was going to quote the part of the article about that, but it's most of the article.

You should just read it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You missed my other comments but nice try.

[–] givesomefucks 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

...

You expected me to go and read all your other comments to understand your one reply to me?

Who has time to do that? Like, not just once, but to do it everytime someone replies to you?

And even if I had, that was the first one in this thread...

Out of morbid curiosity, what are you even talking about about?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

Of course not. It is comments right here on this thread and if you are going to take a shot, you need to take a moment to get your facts together.

What I am talking about is the AI industry already ran out of data well over a year or so ago and have been using synthetic data ever since. The authors of the article clearly know this, but wanted to spin it as if it is an issue when it is not to get the haters to click.