Technology

59193 readers

2434 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

299

Playboy image from 1972 gets ban from IEEE computer journals (arstechnica.com)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/technology

183 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] JJROKCZ 14 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Anyone that gets worked up at the sight of a human shoulder needs to reasses themselves, regardless of gender

[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago (5 children)

If you think this is about an exposed shoulder, you missed the point.

[–] calcopiritus 4 points 7 months ago (4 children)

The point is that the point is stupid. All there is to the image is a girl with a hat and an exposed shoulder. The image came from a porn magazine, so what? All the nudity is taken out. That image doesn't even impact. A child. It takes a very fragile snowflake to be hurt by a normal portrait that just so happens to be from a nude image.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

The imaged is cropped, but cropping doesn't remove the context of the image, and it isn't worth the risk of making women feel less welcome in tech, which is a big problem already.

If I may, why is it so important to you that the image continues to be used over other images, against the wishes of Lena and IEEE?

[–] calcopiritus 4 points 7 months ago

It's not important to me at all. I've only seen the photo a couple times in some Wikipedia pages. I'm just saying that the reason to remove it is stupid. Idgaf if they remove it or not.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Okay, so we'll change that pic with one of a girl with an exposed shoulder, but that's cropped from a girl with a shirt on! That way the context isn't so horrible and you, and many other girls who would otherwise drop out of STEM fields, can rest easy.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)