this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
27 points (90.9% liked)

Selfhosted

37817 readers
455 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.de/post/10554932

I am looking something to connect to my server from outside my local network.

I am on a shared IP and my ISP doesn't have port forwarding.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can recommend rathole ( https://github.com/rapiz1/rathole ).
All it does is port forwarding. Easy to configure, easy to reason about, easy to dockerise.
If you need reverse proxying, you have to set that up either on the public server, or on local infra (chances are, you already have reverse proxy locally so rathole just needs to forward 80/443).

If its only for personal access (ie, you dont want services actually accessible by the internet) i can recommend tailscale for that. Its an auto-configuring wireguard VPN whose main selling point is NAT traversal. Very easy to set up, and very reliable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Why rathole and not ssh tunneling? The latter exposes only one port (that you are already exposing anyway) while the former requires an additional port.

What is the actual benefit of rathole? I an asking genuinely.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hmm, fair.
I liked it cause i could dockerise it next to nginx and do SNI forwarding.
It had obvious and declarative config, which helped me get a redundant tunnel set up. Its great at auto-reconnecting.
I have never used ssh tunnels. Maybe its just as easy as using rathole. Learning ssh tunnels might have been a better path for me.
But rathole clicked, has been rock solid with 0 tinkering or tweaking, the config files make sense, its easy to in a docker container...

So, i cant really answer your question.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Fair, setting up ssh tunnels with autoreconnect and such is indeed more complex.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think 1 big advantage is that rathole can work over a websocket connection.
So, if obfiscating, having to go via HTTP proxies, or whatever... rathole will still work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

This is a great reason, I didn't know, but its interesting.