this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
227 points (95.6% liked)

PCGaming

6558 readers
697 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Honestly I didn't even know this was something people were clamoring for.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (6 children)

We would have to turn off bullet damage for enemies as well

Uh... What? What fucked up weird way of handling damage did they use that they can't turn off friendly fire without also disabling damage entirely? 🤨

Just be honest and say it's not part of the intended design. Because at least then, no one will have fuel to claim that you are incompetent.

[–] VelociCatTurd 28 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It’s clearly a joke. They didn’t even include the whole quote even though it was only three words longer.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Neither did you

"If we turned off friendly fire we would have to turn off bullet damage against enemies as well. It's the law."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

It's clearly a joke

[–] VelociCatTurd 0 points 8 months ago

Sir, do you think that it’s actually a law?

It’s a joke bro. Please go outside and get some social interaction.

load more comments (4 replies)