this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
890 points (99.3% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5832 readers
17 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fidodo 42 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I think it's short sightedness. If you look at the costs over a decade it would be a no brainer to invest in retention, but if you're only looking at the change in this quarter's budget then it's not as clear.

[–] ours 5 points 9 months ago

And we're just looking at salary difference with the new hire here. Hiring and onboarding the right person costs.

[–] exhaust_fan 3 points 9 months ago

It also sadly risks undeserving employees getting raises and becoming much harder to dispose of, especially in jurisdictions where it's hard to fire people.

It's shit. Top talent and young people suffer for it.