Open Source

30919 readers

516 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

101

Redis switching to shared-source licensing model (redis.com)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Looks like there will be a need for another fork 😒

Looks like this will be it: https://codeberg.org/redict/redict

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

With SSPLv1, does that mean one can sell redis hosting as long as everything used to manage it is open source? It says it's based on AGPL. So if say digitalocean open sourced all their api's and UI they could still offer managed redis. It seems like the answer is yes but then the blog post also says

Under the new license, cloud service providers hosting Redis offerings will no longer be permitted to use the source code of Redis free of charge.

That sounds like no.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

This just shows the true intention of the SSPLv1, i.e. to openwash what is in reality a shared-source license.