Hockey

652 readers

12 users here now

Rules

No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No porn.
No Ads / Spamming.

List of Team-Specific Communities:

Metropolitan Division

Atlantic Division

Central Division

Pacific Division

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

You're given the green light to make one rule change for the next NHL season. What rule are you changing? (feddit.uk)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Bettman says he's okay if you want to bring back the rule against forward passes, he doesn't mind if you want to revert to old-school icing, he just demends you keep it to one rule change; you know, evolution is better than revolution...

What rule are you changing, tweaking, binning or creating.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SatouKazuma 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd rather personally see the 3-point system like exists in Europe for this. At least the whole system would be zero-sum at that point.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plus the last 10 minutes of every game won't be so bloody conservative. Teams will want to go for it

[–] SatouKazuma 2 points 1 year ago

Precisely. We'd see a few track meets like the Canes-Panthers OT, which was straight up insane.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you please explain how that works?

[–] SatouKazuma 4 points 1 year ago

3 points for a win in regulation, 2 for a win in OT, 1 for a loss in OT, and 0 for a loss in regulation. Because the OT winner would lose a point compared to winning in regulation, you wouldn't have games that are suddenly worth more, compared to the current system where a game yields a total of 3 points if it goes to OT, and 2 if it doesn't.