this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
54 points (96.6% liked)

Economics

466 readers
267 users here now

founded 2 years ago
 

The 6% commission, a standard in home purchase transactions, is no more.

In a sweeping move expected to dramatically reduce the cost of buying and selling a home, the National Association of Realtors announced Friday a settlement with groups of homesellers, agreeing to end landmark antitrust lawsuits by paying $418 million in damages and eliminating rules on commissions.

The NAR, which represents more than 1 million Realtors, also agreed to put in place a set of new rules. One prohibits agents’ compensation from being included on listings placed on local centralized listing portals known as multiple listing services, which critics say led brokers to push more expensive properties on customers. Another ends requirements that brokers subscribe to multiple listing services — many of which are owned by NAR subsidiaries — where homes are given a wide viewing in a local market. Another new rule will require buyers’ brokers to enter into written agreements with their buyers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Maybe it's me but a realtor has some value. In my house hunting efforts, I'd rather deal with a incompetent realtor than an absolute moron of a homeowner. Realtors, you can explain things and they'll work with the owner. Where a owner (especially shitty ones) get all pissy and antagonistic if you point out the black mold.

[–] StupendousMan 5 points 9 months ago

Yes a realtor can be useful, but 99% of the time they do not deserve 3-6% of the purchase price of the house for the 10-20 hours of work they do for the typical house purchase.