this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
447 points (97.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9670 readers
48 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ConfidentLonely
Fried_out_Kombi
[email protected]
447
Biden pledges billions to rebuild cities ‘torn apart’ by highways decades ago (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/fuckcars
70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fireweed 38 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I saw the headline and thought, "we ripping out the highways or doubling down on them with expensive bandaid 'fixes'?"

Doubling down it is. Crap like this is why Biden will never be a "climate president": we can't address the systemic issues that are the primary drivers of climate change as long as we keep trying to work within the confines of said systems.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Some of the blame lies at the feet of state DOTs that are still drawing up these projects. In Austin's case, I think the I-35 widening is basically being forced down the city's throat by a revanchist state government.

[–] fireweed 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

For sure, state DOTs are completely complicit in the problem (some more than others), as they're the ones deciding and designing the projects (highways are generally their jurisdiction). However the federal government has complete say in what projects they help fund, and could definitely set standards dictating the types of projects to move forward.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I think they tried to do that and Mitch McConnell told red states to ignore those rules and then the feds cowardly backed off.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

@regul @fireweed That’s how US government works. Democrats propose to do something moderate that would help a little bit but they already compromised on important details before they started, Republicans throw a tantrum, Democrats capitulate, billions more dollars get poured down the toilet (or into highways) with very few dollars going to something useful but the net effect being overwhelmingly bad.

[–] fireweed 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Was this back when his wife was transportation Secretary? Cuz she ain't there no more