Asklemmy

43995 readers

934 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Math people: would a ship that is 1/4 slower but can complete a 180° turn 1/4 faster escape its pursuer? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm sure pirates knew the answer. Probably fighter pilots as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Windex007 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I agree they aren't practically interesting egde cases, because in order to hit them, they're no longer meaningful for realistically describing pirate ships. At very high turning speeds, it also ceases to matter that one is 3/4 than that the other either. But at that point, we're talking about pirate ships spinning like ballerinas across the seven seas.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Feel free to extend that problem to fighter jets or ballerinas playing tag 😆

However, I'm pretty sure it's already solved. Doesn't seem difficult to prove and has had applications for centuries already. And I've played the Robots Game when I was 12 or something...