this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
173 points (94.4% liked)

Linux

48721 readers
2441 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

Chatgpt didn’t do a great job of contrasting them. Flatpak is also transparent

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Comparing flatpak with AUR makes almost no sense

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why can it not be compared? It's a repository to install software...

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Flatpak acts like its virtualizing the applications, AUR shipped binaries are build by trusted arch users. Those eco systems operate on totally different levels, there are (more) audits in AUR.

Flatpak or god forbid even Snap are fucked up software distribution platforms you should only use as last resort and when the software you are trying to get is not available on your OS repository/package manager and should be simply avoided.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ah, it's subjective. You trust AUR users rather than flatpak users. Flatpak and snap are hardly comparable. The flaws of Snap are not the flaws of Flatpak. You also prefer binaries to sandboxed apps. You're old school?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

It is not subjective. Its not any AUR user, there are big streams tested especially for that certain system by trusted people before releasing.

And for the record, your sandboxed apps are also binaries and to set it straight, flatpak is mostly not really virtualizing your app. It's complete garbage, have a look at how flatpak achieves this "virtualization" and how it's implemented in 9 out of 10 flatpaks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

A subset of AUR PKGBUILDs are downloading a prebuilt desktop application binary packaged for another distro (deb, rpm, tarball, appimage) from upstream and then unpacking it. Those packages are trying to solve some of the same problems as flatpak, distributing a generic desktop binary but often do it worse and people should be weighing the alternatives. More broadly AUR packages aren't comparable with flatpak but some are.