this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
485 points (96.5% liked)
linuxmemes
21204 readers
90 users here now
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
- LemmyMemes: Memes
- LemmyShitpost: Anything and everything goes.
- RISA: Star Trek memes and shitposts
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
- Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
- Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
- Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
- Bigotry will not be tolerated.
- These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
3. Post Linux-related content
- Including Unix and BSD.
- Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of
sudoin Windows. - No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
4. No recent reposts
- Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've been a Unix admin for almost 30 years.
Systemd really is shitty, and Poettering is a serious asshole; but that ship has sailed. It's time to accept that computers only get worse, and move on.
I'm sad that you have to throw out all the init scripts you've written in 30 years.
Maybe stick with Slackware? I'm pretty sure you'll fit in well there.
Aw gee, thanks!
I never said init scripts (and more importantly, the init process) were the right answer. It doesn't change the fact that systemd has some bad fundamental design and implementation decisions; and that any attempt to address them was met by Poettering saying essentially "this is the way I designed it, and therefore it's right. You're wrong." He has no regards for standards, compatibility, or consistency.
It wasn't even the first replacement for process management out there. Sun had SMF which was effective but flawed; and systemd duplicated almost every one of its flaws.
In other words, saying that init had to be replaced didn't necessarily mean systemd; but that's the world we have now.
I think the community has moved on without you then.
You missed the point where I said "...and move on."
The fact that I dislike it doesn't change the fact that it's prevalent, and so I use systemd every day.
It's the same with any technology I need. Ansible is a mostly awful language, but I need it to do my job, so I buckle down and use it. Git is...well actually git is pretty awesome.
A decade (or two?) ago, perl was the language of choice for complex admin tasks, despite being a nightmare to maintain. Now we have mostly moved to python and ruby, which are generally much better.
My point is that just because a standard (process, tool, etc.) is flawed, we don't refuse to use it; and conversely, just because we use a tool doesn't make it immune to valid criticism.
@swordgeek @possiblylinux127 this from a guy who still uses swords
Hah! That made my day. I'd high five you, but I hurt all over from fencing last night. :-)
Is that really a valid counter argument though? We could say most computer users use windows, doesn't necessarily make it a better os choice.
Yes the community has decided, fair enough, op has already said let's move on. People that have been around for a bit longer than most here and have seen and used Linux from the very beginning are still entitled to an opinion.