Technology

55613 readers

3130 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

200

A.I. Is Making the Sexual Exploitation of Girls Even Worse (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 3 months ago by L4s to c/technology

89 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A.I. Is Making the Sexual Exploitation of Girls Even Worse::Parents, schools and our laws need to catch up to technology, fast.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As much as I would like to blame ai. Photoshop has been doing this for a long time already. I think the public ai sites already do csam searching and stuff for this already but somebody could still run it locally.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

And how many times have you made this comment, only to have it pointed out that there is a big fucking difference between a human manually creating fake images via Photoshop at human speed using human skills, versus automating the process so it can be done en masse at the push of a button?

Because that's a really big fucking difference.

Think: musket versus gatling gun. Yeah, they both shoot bullets, but that's about where the similarity ends.

Is the genie out of the bottle at this point? Probably.

But to claim this doesn't represent a massive shift because Photoshop? Sorry but that's at best naive, and it's starting to get exhausting seeing this "argument" trotted out repeatedly by AI apologists.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah ai would let you make more kiddie porn at a faster rate, but you can't really regulate that. If somebody wanted to draw animated kiddie porn they could still do that. How far would you go until you ban crayons?

I digress, yes, I don't like that this shit is happening and there really isn't a way. Making kiddie porn is already illegal and there's no way to regulate these tools so we can just try our best to catch them.

Some people say this ai thing for porn could lead to less sexual abuse. It's so dark I'm kind of speechless but maybe it could even reduce actual people from getting physically hurt but I have no clue, time will tell.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

If somebody wanted to draw animated kiddie porn they could still do that. How far would you go until you ban crayons

It's genuinely impressive how completely you missed my point.

How about another analogy: US federal law allows people to own individual firearms, but not grenades.

But they're both things that kill people, right? Why would they be treated differently?

Hint: it's about scale.

The same is true of pipe bombs. But anyone can make a pipe bomb. Genie is out of the bottle, right? So why are there laws regulating manufacture and ownership of them? Hmm...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I guess we kind of agree then. A.i is a pipe bomb for kiddie porn and the genie is out of the bottle. Not much we can do about it. We will still have laws but that won't stop anything. I already stated that the easy to access a.i services already prevent this from happening and there will be more regulation, though I don't see what more laws and regulations can bring to the table.