this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
279 points (94.9% liked)

World News

32328 readers
660 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Omegamanthethird -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm 34.

I said liberals not Dems.

I said liberals not Dems.

And learn some damn history yourself. Trump replaced 2 liberal justices which only requires POTUS and Senate. And we learned under Trump that it's much, MUCH easier to hurt people than to help people. Thanks everyone who refused to vote for Hillary. You did this.

You want change? Vote more liberals in. Don't want change? Keep bitching.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yet again, with the disingenious bullshit.

Liberals = Dems

And learn some damn history yourself. Trump replaced 2 liberal justices which only requires POTUS and Senate. And we learned under Trump that it’s much, MUCH easier to hurt people than to help people. Thanks everyone who refused to vote for Hillary. You did this.

You just proved my point, dude. Look you don't need all three branches to actual produce results for your base. The Dems don't produce the results we want because they do not want to not because they're powerless.

[–] Pipoca 3 points 8 months ago

I assume his point is that calling Manchin or Sinema "liberal" isn't super accurate.

[–] Omegamanthethird 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Liberals = Dems

If you think that, you probably shouldn't talk politics. And it's probably not worth the time to talk politics with you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You should probably learn political terms before telling people not to talk politics. Liberalism as defined by Oxford.

[–] Omegamanthethird -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Oh neat. Here's the definition of political by Oxford.