this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
109 points (93.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43393 readers
1763 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you do, then what exactly defines a soul in your view?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So why do brain accidents change your personality, if we're more than atoms? Shouldn't the soul preserve you even if the atoms in the brain are broken from their place?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sense of self does not have to be connected to one's personality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It does. For example many people with depression feel they're worthless (their sense of self), which is fixed by using anti-depressants, meaning it happens in the brain/body. Unless of course anti-depressants are some magical thing that somehow can fix soul.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What you're describing are just feelings, the sense of self-worth. Those are indeed just brain chemistry. What I (and presumably OP) mean by sense of self is the conscious experience of you being a "self" inside your body, separate from the other. This self could still be the same even with a completely different personality and different feelings. Or maybe it wouldn't be. But the point is that we currently know very little about how we get a consciousness or what it's made of. This may change in the future, but until then I can't say we don't have some form of "soul" with any confidence.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

As someone with clinical depression my whole life, I can answer this as no, the depression making me feel worthless is not connect in any way to my sense of "self." That's very seperate from any feeling in general, it just "is."

Sometime I get a feeling/swell of "wonderment" in response to my sense of self if I really concentrate on that "sense," but that feeling of wondermemt is just that: a response.

Also, anti depressants don't work the way most people think they do. In the cases of situational depression, they keep a person getting up and out of bed until they naturally start to feel better, in which case the meds are stopped. In cases of clinical depression though, it's more of a life-long medication that gets them out of bed in the morning. It dulls the depression, but it doesn't get rid of it.

All of that is disconnected from one's sense of "self."

[–] azmalent 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because our personality is defined by the brain. It's fully physical. I never said I believe souls have anything to do with personality.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

But if they don’t have anything to do with who you are as a person (aka personality), and they aren’t your body (aka “just atoms”), then what do they have any impact on?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what exactly does soul do? Just exists and that's it?

[–] azmalent 3 points 1 year ago

I think they give some kind of meaning to the entire universe.

The universe mostly consists of particles that just exist. For inanimate things that do not perceive the flow of time, a Planck time is the same as the universe's entire lifetime. So without sentient observers, time would make no sense. The universe would instantly jump from its initial state to the final one, so it might as well not exist.

It's like in that philosophical question about a tree falling in the forest where no one hears the sound, but instead of the sound it's about time and therefore all existence. Sorry for bad English, I hope I made myself clear.