this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
-32 points (33.7% liked)

Linux

47994 readers
1727 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So the thing with Debian and any Debian based distro like Ubuntu or Linux Mint is there is no big centralized software repo like the AUR. Yes there is the apt repository but if you want something that's not in there, get ready to read the documentation or follow random guides.

For example, one of my friends wanted to download an audio tool called Reaper. On Windows this is just looking up the application and clicking on the .exe. It really depends on the dev if they include a .deb, sometimes you might need to download the .sh file or they may tell you to compile it yourself. Perhaps, you have to add a ppa. On Arch, all I have to do is Paru -S Reaper, if there are multiple Reapers I can look for that by typing Paru Reaper.

Now that Arch is so easy to install with the Archscript, and the software repo so vast and easy to use, is Debian really user friendly if you have to jump through several hoops to download programs?

Edit: yeah yeah there's flathub and stuff but that's more of a last resort, optimally, you want to get it the correct way.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The correct way is getting it from the official source, not a random user-contributed build.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Users don't contribute builds. They contribute a specification file for how the build is made, which through the AUR is downloaded and executed. You can see the package source for every AUR package, and most AUR helpers make you look at the specification file by default.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

These are download instructions from Librewolf's official website:

Ubuntu: https://librewolf.net/installation/debian/

Arch: https://librewolf.net/installation/debian/

Ubuntu is noticeably longer as you need to wget a specific link and adding the keys.

Arch is just one command from the aur whether you want to use pacman, yay, or paru

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If the two steps of adding a repo and its signing key before you install a deb is too much for you, just wait until you need to compile something from source.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I have installed manually before. I'm not saying that it's hard, I'm saying that arch is faster to do so since it's one command. You're not going to memorize the wget link and process to install keys for every program. Why is this so controversial?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You don't need to memorize them. They're literally given to you on the page. Copy, paste.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I don't even need to visit any page or look stuff up if I just type paru librewolf paru will search the aur for me directly in the terminal showing the amount of votes, version number, if it's orphaned or not. If I absolutely know the package name I can type in paru -S librewolf

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

paru -S librewolf