this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
376 points (90.5% liked)

memes

10679 readers
3044 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FenrirIII 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm having a real hard time finishing Baldur's Gate 3. I wasn't a fan of Larian's other games, but I loved the first Baldur's Gate games. The constant frustration from having to save scum, buggy gameplay, and endless annoying puzzles just makes it a chore. I'll finish it, eventually, but I need a week between sessions to forget.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

People say that it's a heavily polished game but 4/5 of my characters I had to throw away because of some bug that made their build useless, or put the story in a state that I wasn't happy with. And my 20 charisma builds might as well have been 1 charisma because I failed Every. Single. Roll.

If EA put out the exact same game it would have been blasted.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] Katana314 2 points 9 months ago

The biggest fallacy I felt from XCom was putting a miss statistic on everything.

You need to walk to work. You take a step forward. You take a step forward. You take a step forward. (Repeat x 1000) You fail your step forward, fall forwards bending your knee back, and become permanently paralyzed! You’re also still expected at the office.

In an action game, if I miss an enemy with an assault rifle…I just shoot again in the same second.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

That's 5e, actually. Don't get me wrong you can fail a roll in much better games, but in Pathfinder your character build actually matters. It's an issue with the bounded accuracy, a fundamentally terrible idea for a game (tabletop or otherwise).

[–] FenrirIII 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The rolling is so bad. 90% chance to hit? Miss

[–] bruhduh 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] MightyGalhupo 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] bruhduh 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] MightyGalhupo 1 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I like the game, its plain to see Larian is a skilled developer, but fucking hell the dnd influence is just poison. The setting? Mid outside of the Larian specific writing, wizards have always had uninteresting world building. The underlying the system? Fucking awful, 5e is easily the worst ttrpg i have ever played (out of 8 i think, including a completely homemade game and condensing very similar games). Those rolls you failed? That shit is called bounded accuracy and i have never seen a worse design choice, it's impossible to make a character that actually specializes in something. Every character must be able to succeed and fail and everything.