this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
99 points (97.1% liked)

British Columbia

1375 readers
7 users here now

News, highlights and more relating to this great province!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I appreciate the effort, and I think this might be good legislation. Not sure yet, but it's worth to try and see.

That said, I don't really know if house flippers are really "speculators". I don't see speculation involved in arguing that a house is worth more after renovation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The days of "flippers" being "renovators" is long gone. The model now is to buy them for 30% less than they would probably bring on the fair market by straight-up lying and telling homeowners that realtors fees and time lost (ie: doing showings) are equivalent to the difference (they're not, not by a long shot), then turning around and posting the same goddamn properties (using realtors, natch) at their full market price and clearing the 30%.

The world is full of impatient idiots, so naturally this is a profitable business model. If you don't think it's profitable, then I invite you to look at all the ad money spent on "I'M DICK FUCK THE HOMEBUYER AND I WANT TO BUY YOUR HOME" ads, articles, text messages and spam emails. You can't spend that kind of money on marketing and not be a goddamn insanely profitable legal scam.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Sounds fair, but negotiating purchases below market values - even if at a grifter level - is still not speculation either. Making a profit off of "impatient idiots" is at best shady arbitrage, it should still be resold near market value anyway.