this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
129 points (97.8% liked)

World News

39040 readers
2716 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Need to leave sites as close to as they were as possible, else clues about the past could be accidentally destroyed, especially clues that we do not have the technology to analyze yet

[–] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago (1 children)

historical conservation isn't really this cut and dry

sometimes it's better to restore things, or to do work to prevent them degrading further

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

True, but that still revolves around leaving it aa close as possible to how they were - preservation sometimes requiring active work to keep clues around

For the pyramids, the rate of exterior decay is probably deemed far less destructive than the need to use cement to restore the granite

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

but when is the exact point of "how they were" when 4000 years of erosion has already taken place?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I guess people want them to be fashionably ruined.

Frankly, I think re-cladding the pyramids would be great for keeping clues around, provided they don't touch the existing stones while putting new ones on. That'll stop erosion from digging deeper into the existing structure.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ye, I'd say the cement is the real issue there. If they could just place the granite blocks and not use cement, then that would work

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

They could mold each block, cast concrete into the mold, and use that as the base for the stones.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It makes me wonder where the cutoff is for maintaining old things. Obviously pyramids fall on the "leave it alone" side because they're about the oldest buildings in existence, but I wonder about, say, Renaissance-era buildings.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I've seen the occasional controversy about restoring medieval castles. This one comes to mind as a particularly unusual and controversial case - the remains of the original castle were so badly degraded that there wasn't really much left, so the restorers built obviously modern-looking walls that had the original castle's fragments embedded in them held up in the correct places and shapes. Sort of like a reconstructed dinosaur skeleton where a bunch of the bones were missing.

Putting the original limestone cladding back on the pyramids would be interesting, it would probably "look fake" because the original pyramid cladding was extremely smooth and clean much like a modern concrete structure would appear. People don't expect it to look that way. Sort of like how a lot of the old marble statues and architecture from ancient Greece and Rome used to be brightly painted, but those wore off and now everyone thinks of pure white stone when they imagine what an ancient sculpture from there is supposed to look like.

Edit: In violation of the norms of social media, I read the article. The plan with the pyramid wasn't even as drastic as I thought, apparently for the pyramid that they were considering doing this to the original cladding is still available. It's just fallen off and is lying around the pyramid's base.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sort of like how a lot of the old marble statues and architecture from ancient Greece and Rome used to be brightly painted

I would love to visit a museum that has original ancient sculptures side by side with reproductions of how they looked originally.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

If you're in Europe, there's the exhibition on this topic at the Gallo-Roman Museum in Tongeren, Belgium for a few more months, after previous stops at, among other places, the Met:

https://galloromeinsmuseum.be/en/see-and-do/antiquity-in-colour/

At least in some cases, they have the side-by-side comparisons you're looking for (although they obviously don't have originals of the most famous statues).

Video with more info:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULQvS-iKNcQ

A beautiful page on a prior exhibition, with images that allow you to switch between the reconstruction and the "white" look the statues have now after millennia or decay:

https://buntegoetter.liebieghaus.de/en/

In case you need an overview of future exhibitions:

https://www.polychromyroundtable.com/exhibitions.php

Not that the above page got the dates for the exhibition in Belgium wrong, stating that it's until July, whereas it's actually until June this year.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=ULQvS-iKNcQ

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.