this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

Cricket

253 readers
1 users here now

Upcoming fixtures:

Men's Ashes

| Date | Match | Result | |


|


|


| | 16th June | 1st Test | AUS by 2 wickets | | 28th June | 2nd Test | AUS by 43 runs | | 6th July | 3rd Test | ENG by 3 wickets | | 19th July | 4th Test | Draw | | 27th July | 5th Test | |

Women's Ashes

| Date | Match | Result | |


|


|


| | 22nd June | Only Test | AUS by 89 runs | | 2nd July | First T20I | AUS by 4 wickets | | 6th July | Second T20I | ENG by 3 runs | | 9th July | Third T20I | ENG by 5 wickets | | 12th July | First ODI | ENG by 2 wickets | | 16th July | Second ODI | AUS by 3 runs | | 18th July | Third ODI | ENG by 69 runs (DLS) |

Series drawn - AUS retain the Ashes

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If you leave your crease before umpire calls "over" you're out.

Bairstow needs to work on his match awareness. I'm betting it wasn't a one off.

Also, Broad is a dick.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I thought it was a dead ball.

"20.1.1 The ball becomes dead when

20.1.1.1 it is finally settled in the hands of the wicket-keeper or of the bowler."

And about as shit a play as a mankad.

Left a blight over a great game and a great win

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And about as shit a play as a mankad.

So not shit at all?

Being serious: I think this play deserves to be quite controversial. Mankadding absolutely does not. Mankadding is only made possible by a batsman trying to sneak an advantage. If there's no risk involved in that, it's just an unfair advantage. Mankadding is that risk. Totally fair.

This situation is a little different. I think the right call was made, but there was no advantage to be gained by Bairstow. He just made a mistake in thinking the ball was dead when it wasn't. (And if you think the rules quoted make it clear it was dead—well by my reading, the strictest interpretation of that wording would mean that stumping is literally always impossible, because an unpire can't stump without having the ball in his hands.)

It left a blight because you'd always rather win without a controversial call, but it was the right call.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There's the laws of the game, and the spirit of the game.

I'm just sad that the spirit of the game has been eaten by the win at all costs attitude.

The fact we're even discussing this is embarrassing and saddens me, and I won't comment any more on it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I hope you stamped your foot furiously after writing this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)