this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
937 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

62131 readers
4839 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The blue LED was supposed to be impossible—until a young engineer proposed a moonshot idea.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was working for a place that was the market leader in a certain niche of simulation software. Their simulation was about 10x more efficient than their competitors. However, that version of the software is strictly off limits for the public, and made a version which they sold with a sleep statement so that it was only 1.1x faster than the next best solution. That way they could remain market leaders any time the competitors released a better version. Even though many systems rely on growing simulations to simulate bigger scenarios that could help save lives.

Just an example of capitalism impeding progress.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Open source software solves that kind of hidden bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Exactly why I left that company.

Specifically free (libre) licences, as permissive licences allow corporations to improve/adapt the software without contributing back to the community.

I only work on software with GPL compatible licences now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And open source software is explicitly anti-capitalist.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

free software is. open source is an attempt to sell free software out to capitalist interest.

eric raymond and the OSI are not good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are many forms of free and/or open source software.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but open source isn't anticapitalist

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I guess the original statement was too broad, but any FOSS using a GPL license effectively is. I guess not anti-capitalist though, but un-capitalist. It doesn't try to remove capitalism, it tries to be seperate from it.