Ask Science

155 readers

1 users here now

Ask a science question, get a science answer.

founded 1 year ago

If time is relative, how can we say the known universe is 13 billion years old. Wouldn’t different parts of the universe been in existence for more or less time? Is this relative to us? Or an average? (self.askscience)

submitted 9 months ago by SuckMyWang to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Cool question.

I assumed that once we decided what a second was, that's what we're going off of for that 13 billion year assessment.

I guess that's mostly correct from what I can find online.

From the point of the big bang or creation or whatever, time has been progressing second by second for 13.7 billion years.

With the consistency of time measurement scientists use, it seems like that's why they use conventional standards of time to measure how long the universe has been around.