432
With all the talk about privacy, people seem to be forgetting that censorship is also a major problem for today's internet.
(lemmy.world)
Many "alternative" search engines are better for privacy, but they are still vulnerable to censorship, because they rely on g**gle and m*crosoft's indices for their search results. This isn't a deep-hidden secret either, many of them disclose what search index they use on the "about" page, for example:
- https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/
- https://support.startpage.com/hc/en-us/articles/5138782571796-Why-isn-t-a-particular-site-appearing-in-the-results
- https://www.ecosia.org/privacy
There are still search engines that (claim to) maintain their own index. Most surprisingly, br*ve:
Censoring names in a post about censoring is hilarious irony.
That crap always reminds me of late 90s GameFAQs where people would think that spelling it "sh!t" wouldn't get their comment deleted
I remember a page where people could post gossip about other people, but you weren't allowed to cuss, so people wrote things like:
Do you happen to have Becky's phone number?
Well, they were correct more often than wrong.
I especially like censoring Brave but then providing a link with the name
I imagine it's to not provide SEO for the companies
I think it might just be a joke